Deconstruction of the Existence of Khidr: A Study of Sheikh Mahfudz al-Tarmasi’s Thought Through Derridean Hermeneutics Approach

Authors

  • Muhammad Agil Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Alwi Shobri Alwi UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Mahmudi Mahmudi International Open University, The Gambia. Afrika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35309/alinsyiroh.v10i2.296

Keywords:

Deconstruction, Hermeneutics, Khidr, Mahfudz al-Tarmasi

Abstract

Discussions on the existence of Prophet Khidr in Islamic tradition have long been debated. Questions about his status as a prophet or saint, whether he is still alive or has passed away, and other issues remain significant among Muslims. These debates have also drawn the interest of Sheikh Mahfudz al-Tarmasi, a prominent Nusantara scholar. In his work, “Ināyat al-Muftaqir bimā Yata`allaq bi Sayyidinā al-Khidr `Alaihi al-Salām.” al-Tarmasi offers detailed and critical insights into Prophet Khidr’s existence. This research examines al-Tarmasi views using Derridean hermeneutics to deconstruct traditional thoughts on Prophet Khidr and encourage new interpretations. Employing a qualitative descriptive literature method, the study aims to gain a deeper understanding of Prophet Khidr’s existence. By applying Derrida’s deconstructive approach, this paper shows how al-Tarmasi addresses the contradictions among the views of Sufis, hadith scholars, and jurists about Prophet Khidr. The findings suggest that al-Tarmasi supports the idea that Prophet Khidr is still alive, thus reinforcing the Sufi perspective in Islamic tradition. This alignment not only highlights al-Tarmasi’s critical stance but also contributes to the broader discourse on the diverse interpretations of Islamic teachings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

al-`Asqalānī, Aḥmad bin `Alī bin Ḥajar. Al-Zahr Al-Naḍir Fī Ḥāl Al-Khiḍir. Kuwait: Maktabah Ahli al-Athar, 2010.

al-Asqalani, Ibnu Hajar. Rahasia Nabi Khidir. Translated by Agus Khudlori. Jakarta: Turos Pustaka, 2018.

Al-Bukhārī, Abī ‘Abdillah Muḥammad bin Ismā’īl. Al-Jāmi’ Al-Ṣaḥīḥ. Kairo: al-Matba’ah al-Salafiyah, 1983.

al-Dimashiqī, Ismā`īl bin `Umar Bin Kathīr al-Qurashī. Tafsīr Al-Qur’an Al-`Aẓīm. Riyadh: Dār al-Ṭayyibah, 1999.

al-Fayyadl, Muhammad. Derrida. Yogyakarta: LkiS, 2015.

al-Ismā`īl, Nabīl bin Muḥammad. Al-`Ināyah Bi Al-Qur’an Wa `Ulūmihi. Riyadh: Jāmi` al-Iāam Ibn Sa`ūd, 2002.

al-Marṣafī, `Abd al-Fattāḥ al-Sayyīd. Hidāyah Al-Qārī. Madinah: Maktabah al-Ṭayyīb, 2010.

al-Ṭabarī, Abī Ja`far Muḥammad bin Jarīr. Tafsīr Al-Ṭabarī. Kairo: al-Dirāsāt al-`Arabiyah, 2001.

al-Tarmasi, Muhammad Mahfudz. Kifāyat Al-Mustafīd Limā `Alā Min Al-Asānīd. Beirut: Dār al-Bashāir al-Islāmiyyah, 1408.

al-Tarmasi, Syekh Mahfudz. Ināyat Al-Muftaqir Bimā Yata`allaq Bi Sayyidinā Al-Khidir ‘Alaihi Al-Salām. Rembang: al-Maktabah al-Ma’had al-Anwar, 2020.

Al-Tarmasi, Syekh Mahfudz. Bughyat Al-Adhkiyā’i Fī Al-Baḥth `an Karāmāt Al-Awliyā’. Depok: Sahifa Publishing, 2020.

al-Ziriklī, Khayr al-Dīn. Al-A`lām. Beirut: Dār al-‘Ilm al-Malayin, 2007.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.

At-Tarmasi, Syekh Muhammad Mahfudz. Nabi Khidir Dan Keramat Para Wali. Translated by Ahmad Dzulfikar. Depok: Sahifa Publishing, 2020.

Azizeh, Nurul. “Mukjizat Naratologis: Studi Andragogi Atas Kisah Musa-Khidr Dalam Surah Al-Kahfi 60-82.” Ilmu Ushuluddin 18, no. 1 (2019): 188–202. https://doi.org/10.18592/jiiu.v.

Bahar, Khalifi Elyas. Khidir Sang Nabi Super Misterius. Yogyakarta: DIVA Press, 2015.

Faisol, M. “Struktur Naratif Cerita Nabi Khidir Dalam Al-Qur’an.” Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra 10, no. 2 (2011): 233. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2011.10202.

Fauzan, Ahmad. “Syekh Mahfudz Al-Tarmasi: Muhaddis Nusantara.” Tahdis: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Hadis 9, no. 2 (2019): 119–45. https://doi.org/10.24252/tahdis.v9i2.7525.

Fauzi, M. Ihsan. “Penafsiran Khidir Dalam Al-Qur’an Perspektif Tafsir Ruh Al-Ma’ani Dan Tafsir Lathaif Al-Isyarat (Studi Analisis Perbandingan Penafsiran Surat Al-Kahfi Ayat 60-82).” Tesis, Malang, Program Magister Studi Islam Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, 2023. http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/51040/.

Fauziah, Anita, and Ahmad Syamsu Rizal. “Implikasi Edukatif Kisah Nabi Musa Dan Nabi Khidir Dalam Qs. Al-Kahfi/18: 60-82 (Studi Literatur Terhadap 5 Tafsir Mu’tabarah).” Tarbawy: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education 6, no. 1 (2019): 33–43. https://doi.org/org/10.17509/jpp.v21i2.

Fikri, Moch. Ali. “Kisah Pertemuan Nabi Musa Dan Nabi Khidir Dalam Al-Qur’an Surah Al-Kahfi Ayat 60-82 (Kajian Semiotika Ferdinand De Saussure).” Skripsi, Jember, Fakultas Ushuluddin Adab dan Humaniora Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq, 2021. http://digilib.uinkhas.ac.id/12367/.

Gafar, Muhajirin. Muhammad Mahfudz Al-Tarmasi: Ulama Hadis Nusantara Pertama. Yogyakarta: Idea Press, 2018.

Ghanamī, Sayyid Salāmah. Sayyidinā Al-Khiḍir `Alayhi Al-Salām. Kairo: Dār al-Aḥmadī, 2000.

Hardiman, F. Budi. Seni Memahami, Hermeneutik Dari Schleiermacher Sampai Derrida. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2015.

Moleong, Lexi J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.

Mubin, Zanuar. “Pemikiran Fiqh Jual Beli Syaikh Muhammad Mahfudz Al-Tarmasi (Kontekstualisasi Konsep Jual Beli Al-Mu’āṭāh),” 2020. https://etheses.iainponorogo.ac.id/8845/.

Muhtar, Imam. Tremas Makkah Nusantara. Ponorogo: CV. Nata Karya, 2017.

Mustofa, Saiful. “‘Hantu’ Derrida Dan Berhala Kontemporer.” Kontemplasi: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 5, no. 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.21274/kontem.2017.5.2.311-328.

Narwan, Aditia. “The Story of Musa and Khidir in QS. Al-Kahfi (18): 60-82 According to Al-Alusi’s Prespective.” Tesis, Semarang, Ushuluddin and Humanity Faculty UIN Walisongo, 2019, n.d. https://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/id/eprint/12215/1/SKRIPSI_1504026013_ADITIA_NARWAN.pdf.

Sanaya, Muhammad Adib. “Kisah Nabi Musa Dan Nabi Khidir Dalam Surat Al-Kahfi Ayat 60-82 Menurut Tafsir Al-Sha’rawiy (Studi Analisis Hermeneutika Jorge J. E. Gracia).” Skripsi, Cirebon, Jurusan Ilmu al-Qur’an dan Tafsir Fakultas Ushuluddin Adab dan Dakwah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Syekh Nurjati, 2022. https://repository.syekhnurjati.ac.id/8158/.

Siregar, Mangihut. “Kritik Terhadap Teori Dekonstruksi Derrida.” Journal of Urban Sociology 2, no. 1 (2019): 65. https://doi.org/10.30742/jus.v2i1.611.

Suprapto, H. M. Bibit. Ensiklopedi Ulama Nusantara, Riwayat Hidup, Karya Dan Sejarah Perjuangan 157 Ulama Nusantara. Jakarta: Gelegar Media Indonesia, 2010.

Susanto, Edi. Studi Hermeneutika: Kajian Pengantar. Jakarta: Kencana, 2018.

Tadjid, Heri Kurniawan. Story of Khidir AS: Mistik Dan Makrifat Sang Nabi Misterius. Yogyakarta: Araska, 2017.

Taufiqurrohman, Mohammad Arif, and Afif Kholisun Nashoih. “Gaya Bahasa Dialog Nabi Musa Dan Nabi Khidr Dalam Surah Al-Kahfi (Kajian Stilistika Al-Quran).” Al-Lahjah 7, no. 2 (2021): 8–31. https://doi.org/10.32764/lahjah.v7i2.1978.

Udang, Frety Cassia. “Berhemeneutik Bersama Derrida.” Tumou Tou 6, no. 2 (2019): 117–27. https://doi.org/10.51667/tt.v6i2.148.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Agil, M. ., Alwi, A. S., & Mahmudi, M. (2024). Deconstruction of the Existence of Khidr: A Study of Sheikh Mahfudz al-Tarmasi’s Thought Through Derridean Hermeneutics Approach. Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 10(2), 306–340. https://doi.org/10.35309/alinsyiroh.v10i2.296